Monthly Archives: July 2018

The Crime of Jacob Zuma

The Crime of Jacob Zuma

by PD Lawton ,    30 July 2018

Tensions are increasing in South Africa. Politically the country is divided with the deepest scism yet appearing within the ruling party of the ANC. Socially and economically South Africa is at break-point as wealth inequality reaches an obscene high, leaving the majority who live outside of the goldfish bowl, in a state of desperation. Recent hikes in electricity, fuel and food prices are pushing this nation to the brink. Now the issue of land expropriation is being manipulated to be a catalyst for disaster instead of a bridge to unity.

Cecil John Rhodes, one of the South African founding oligarchs who became Prime Minister of the Cape Colony in 1890 once remarked on the necessity to own and control the colony`s media for, as he said,” the press rules the minds of men.”

The `captured` South African media of today are feeding the population fake news. Those who have been duped by the election of Cyril Ramaphosa to the office of president, remain fixated by the meaningless fluctuation of the Rand on the world stock markets while Zuma`s economic reforms are given junk status.

The media have made a clean job of Zuma `s character assassination by linking his name to every piece of filth they can find or invent in order to influence popular opinion. He has now been replaced with the Oppenheimer asset, Cyril Ramaphosa, supported by his coterie of the South African black elite, the likes of his brother-in-law Patrice Motsepe who, like Ramaphosa, were gifted entry into the City of London controlled gold, platinum and diamond extractive industries and source of South Africa`s considerable wealth.

The South African mining industry has been in the hands of the oligarchs since the discovery of gold and diamonds 150 years ago.Those resources have been a major source of funding not for the people of South Africa but for the British Empire. Cecil John Rhodes left his formidable legacy to Nathan Meyer Rothschild whose family , until recently, have set the daily gold standard from St Swithin`s Lane which is located within the precinct of the City of London, on behalf of the British Empire.

Cyril Ramaphosa has been marketed as Mr Fix-it, Mr Clean who will clear up all Zuma`s `state capture` and corruption. Ramaphosa is a skin graft from the most corrupt, untransparent and imperialist  system this world has ever known.  He has been groomed by the South African mining oligarchy since the late 1970s when he was recruited into the Urban Foundation of the gold-mining conglomerate Anglovaal and later worked as head of the largest trade unions, although having never worked in the mines. It was his work with the trade unions that gave Ramaphosa his title of champion of the working man whilst achieving exactly what was asked of him by the mine management. Ramaphosa has long since been assimilated into the machine.

Ramaphosa nailed his colours to the wall the moment he became president of South Africa. He replaced Mosebenzi Zwane with Gwede Mantashe as Minister of Mineral Resources. Has Mantashe the task of dismantling the Zuma administration`s revolutionary new Mining Charter ?

In 2017 the Zuma led ANC announced a new mandatory set of regulations that was imposed on the mining industry.With Zwane as Minister of Mineral Resources the government began what should have remained a non- negotiable transfer of revenue from the conglomerates to the government. Under the new Mining Charter the plan was to create a Mining Transformation Development Agency that would receive billions in extra taxes from the conglomerates. The Agency was to be under the sole control of the Ministry of Mineral Resources. The South African Chamber of Mines has been wailing and wining that Zuma was making the industry unattractive to foreign investment.

Also in the Mining Charter, was another move against the real state capture in South Africa, a move to re-legislate the use of mineral reserves. The Zuma administration had planned to enforce increased processing of minerals, known by the term `benefication` whereby raw materials are processed and manufactured into end products.The legislation also encompassed a vital element that it would be the State who decide the value of a mineral

This would be tantamount to an economic revolution for the country but was fought against on the basis that South Africa cannot provide enough energy to power such large scale industrial development, a short sighted and sadly stupid outlook. With a second nuclear facility operating with home produced uranium, all of this and so much more is possible.But economic visions such as those sound the death knell for the parastic conglomerates like Glencore who profit from African under-development.

Glencore Xtrata is the global mining giant, together with AngloAmerican and their combined subsiduaries, it dominates the mining industry of the continent. Glencore is headquartered in Switzerland which is where the profits are reaped from Africa`s copper extraction under CEO Ivan Glasonberg. Glencore has been the primary supplier of coal, mined in KwaZulu Natal, to the South African energy utility, Eskom.

Zuma wanted Glencore out. It would appear that using the Gupta family with their business know-how and access to capital, he managed this albeit using an underhand method.Zuma in a speech given in Braamfontein earlier this year dicussed the idea of freedom. What is freedom, he asked. Freedom according to him has 3 pillars, political freedom, energy freedom and security freedom. Those are the pillars of a nation`s sovereignty and without all 3 a nation is only free in theory. South Africans he said, only have political freedom.

Zuma has pushed for the expansion of South Africa`s nuclear industry. That industry is at present world class.

If South Africa were to increase its nuclear energy supply, it could within a very short time be energy sufficient without even the need to mine coal. Zuma has attempted to resurrect South Africa`s uranium industry and once again used the Guptas. The press have all along screamed state capture at any of Zuma`s visionary economic reforms.His plans for nuclear energy have been called unaffordable by finance ministers who lack an understanding of what drives an economy. Investing in the nation`s future and continual advancement of technology push an economy onto an upward trend.

Trevor Manuel was the first finance minister of a democratic South Africa under Nelson Mandela. In later years Manuel left the Treasury and went to work for the Rothschilds. Predictably his economic policy was liberal. Thabo Mbeki continued with liberal economics. It was only under Zuma that this policy began to change. Zuma appointed Rob Davies as Minister of Trade and Industry. Davies, like Zuma, believes in non-liberal economics. Zuma has consistently pushed for more and more state control and fought against privatization. Davies belief in state control is because he is a communist, however, Zuma`s conviction in an economic system like that of the American System of Political Economy as devised by Alexander Hamilton, the conviction that government exists to improve the well being of the nation and that national banks should exist to issue credit for national development.

The Zuma administration came under serious international fire when Rob Davies cancelled a swathe of foreign investment treaties from Europe, the UK and USA. These treaties were along the lines of the Trans-Pacific Partenership and highly erosive of national government. The proposed investments worth many billions of dollars, were based on international arbitration and any disputes would have had foreign courts superceding South African law. Zuma`s insistance on state control as a founding basis for securing the protection of the economy has been called State Capture.

Thuli Madonsela, as Public Protector, has led this campaign to warp out of all recognition, Zuma`s efforts to achieve national sovereignty. It is through her treatise on the supposed crimes of Zuma, a document called State Capture, that a brainwashing program has been orchestrated both domestically and across the western world. With the subsequent down grading by the Wall Street rating`s agencies of the Rand, this has been no less than a masked economic war against the Zuma administration in the Zuma faction of the ANC`s final battle and stand for its turn to the East and a new paradigm for Africa.

Johan Rupert is a member of the South African oligarchy and acts as the City of London`s front man in what it continues to consider as its private colony. Rupert controls much of the media in South Africa and like his late father, Anton Rupert, advisers government. The Rupert`s advice has always been regarded as an order of action by government, that is until the presidency of Jacob Zuma.

In a recent publication by South African self-made tycoon, Gayton McKenzie, entitled `Kill Zuma by Any Means Necessary`, the author states that in a private meeting with an ANC minister, Rupert threatened that if Zuma did not follow his instructions ” he and his friends would destroy the economy and make South Africa look worse than Zimbabwe”. His `advise` was not to replace the Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan or CEO of Eskom, Mcebisi Jonas.

Pro- BRICS Finance Minister Malusi Gigaba

Jacob Zuma is the first president to disobey orders. After that interview he appointed his choice of Finance Minister, Malusi Gigaba, and began to implement an economic roll-out that this country has never in all its history had the opportunity to experience. Radical Economic Transformation is intended to be the process by which the monopoly stranglehold on the South African economy is broken. Against Rupert`s orders he placed Brian Molefe as head of Eskom in his bid to secure South Africa`s energy sovereignty.

London assets have been used to discredit, falsly accuse and demonize everything that the Zuma led ranks of the ANC have set out to create as the future for South Africans.

Julius Malema is a British asset and his handler is former British Ambassador to South Africa, Robin Renwick. Malema is a dispicable character , expelled from the ANC Youth League, he formed the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and spends his time demonizing Zuma and preaching racial hatred to the masses of young, hopeless and unemployed South Africans to whom he promises the earth once South Africa is free of White Monopoly Capital by which term he means white South Africans.

Malema`s sickening ideas are regularly granted air-time and he has been welcomed into the bosom of the British Empire. On his last tour of the UK he addressed the Oxford Union and was given a prime time BBC interview.It was an associate of Malema`s who led the #Rhodes MustFall campaign, Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh who is himself a Rhodes Scholar. This sythetic anti-colonial movement , just like the EFF are crafted by London and despite the anti-imperialism rhetoric completely bypass the real issue at stake, not the colossus of the vile Cecil John Rhodes but the crumbling ediface of the British Empire and its entire anti-human monetary system.

Malema`s white counter-part , Simon Roche, fronts an Afrikaner nationalist organisation called Suidlanders. The role that Simon Roche and his organisation are playing is to prime the international public for a genocide in South Africa.

There are other assets at work who are being used to instill racial violence and fear within South Africa. An old apartheid-era slogan has been resurected ” One Settler, One Bullet”.

The main opposition party to the ANC is the Democratic Alliance whose liberal economic policies remain rooted in Wall Street globalism, privatization, hedge funds and foreign investment incentives. They appear as the liberal counterpart to the ANC`s other opposition, Julius Malema`s EFF. The DA has historically been the mining conglomerates captured party. It would appear that the land expropriation issue is being crafted from London to rid South Africa of both the EFF and the ANC.

London has a vested interest in maintaining its monopoly over the South African economy and they are using their classic divide and rule strategy. The British Empire and its anti-human monetarist system does not care how many lives are lost, black or white. Their limited thinking only extends to grasping onto their diminishing stock piles of fake money. They cannot understand that fake money is not wealth and that real wealth can only come from a continous improvement to a nation`s living standards and by understanding that the science of economics is the science of human progess.

By using credit issued from national banks, China has all but eliminated poverty, through development of the physical economy and investment in technology. China is using this principle in the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative and is saying to all African countries that they too can eliminate poverty by raising the standard of living through advancements in technology and investment in the physical economy. It is under the Zuma administration that South Africa opened its arms wide to China and became the first African country to join the BRICS iniative.

Jacob Zuma and his former wide Nkosozana Dlamini Zuma fought tooth and nail to get South Africa in this visionary position. For the Zuma faction of the ANC the only future for the country is within the New Paradigm, an Africa and a world united by the common aims of mankind, united by economic development in the aim of human progress. That is why the British hate Zuma and why their mielie-mouthed media have gone to such extremes to ruin his work and discredit his name.

 

Putin To Light Up Africa; African Leaders Gather at BRICS Summit

re posted from                                      Africa and the World

Putin To Light Up Africa; African Leaders Gather at BRICS Summit

Putin To Light Up Africa; African Leaders Gather at BRICS Summit

Russia will light up Africa – Putin

Russia will light up Africa - Putin
The African continent is in huge need of energy investments, and Russia could become one of its key partners, according to President Vladimir Putin speaking at BRICS summit in Johannesburg.

“I would especially like to note that Russia is planning to step up its assistance in development of national energy in African states,” said the Russian president during the BRICS-Africa Outreach panel on Friday.

Read more

Commercial port of Novorossiysk, Russia © Vladimir Astapkovich

The leaders of governments of BRICS member states (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) were holding a panel dedicated to economics cooperation between the bloc and African countries. The rationale behind the BRICS Plus concept is to create a platform for greater interaction and partnerships amongst countries to win more power for emerging economies globally.

According to Putin, Russia is in talks with Angola, Mozambique and Gabon on implementing promising oil and gas projects. “In the field of nuclear energy, where Russia is the technological leader, we offer African partners to build an industry from scratch,” the Russian president said. These projects are crucial for Africa since about 600 million people on the continent live without electricity.

Energy is not the only sphere where Russia and Africa could cooperate, according to Putin. “Russian business shows interest in working with African partners in a wide range of areas, including agriculture, healthcare, the development of mass communications, geology and subsoil use,” Putin said.

As examples, Putin mentioned Angola, where Russia’s Alrosa is interested in mining diamonds, a joint venture between Russia and Burundi on the production of lighting products for exports to East Africa, and agriculture projects in Senegal.

Modi Emphasizes India’s Commitment to Africa’s Development at the BRICS

July 27, 2018

Addressing a BRICS Outreach Dialogue Session today in presence of a large number African heads of state, Indian Premier Narendra Modi said: “The coming together of so many African leaders during this program is a wonderful thing. India’s ties with Africa are time-tested. The Government of India has deepened engagement with Africa. Economic and development cooperation between India and Africa have touched new heights,” India’s WION TV news reported from Johannesburg.

Among the African heads of state were: Paul Kagame (Rwanda), Yoweri Museveni (Uganda), Edgar Lungu (Zambia), Hage Geingob (Namibia), João Lourenço (Angola), Emmerson Mnangagwa (Zimbabwe), Ali Bongo Ondimba (Gabon), Mokgweetsi Masisi (Botswana) and Peter Mutharika (Malawi). The African leaders were invited by the host nation, South Africa, to discuss ways of pursuing inclusive growth on the continent with the BRICS heads of state, reported China CGTN television network.

South Africa’s BRICS website points out that since it last hosted the summit in 2013, all BRICS hosts have included an out reach format: “In 2013, South Africa took the initiative to activate the provision for a BRICS Dialogue with partners from the Global South, as per the Sanya Declaration that stated: ‘We are open to increasing engagement and cooperation with non-BRICS countries, in particular emerging and developing countries, and relevant international and regional organisations.’”

In his address, Modi, highlighting the ongoing cooperation between India and the African nations and welcoming the effort for regional economic integration by the African countries, he said “in the last four years, we have had more than 100 visits and meetings at the levels of heads of state and various government levels and these have taken our economic relations and development cooperation to a new high. India has offered 180 lines of credit worth $11 billion in more than 40 countries in Africa.”

In addition, he said that “every year 8,000 African students get scholarships to study in India” and pointed out that his country now has an e-network in 48 African countries for telemedicine.

Source: lawrencefreemanafricaandtheworld

China loans to Africa energy, infrastructure projects almost trebled 2016-2017- report

re posted from                                 Weekly Xpose

http://weeklyxpose.co.za/2018/07/26/china-loans-africa-energy-infrastructure-projects-almost-trebled-2016-2017-report/

China loans to Africa energy, infrastructure projects almost trebled 2016-2017- report

The 4th BRICS export credit agencies (ECAs) meeting on Tuesday, attended by all five heads ECAs of BRICS countries. FILE PHOTO: ANA

JOHANNESBURG, July 26 – The value of Chinese loans to energy and infrastructure projects in Africa almost trebled between 2016 and 2017 to nearly US$9 billion and the impact of this lending is increasingly visible in Africa, law firm Baker McKenzie said at the sidelines of a BRICS summit.

Baker McKenzie, participating at the July 25-27 summit in Johannesburg which has drawn hundreds of delegates from Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) said loans had risen from $3 billion to $8.8bn, with policy lenders China Development Bank and China Exim particularly active in helping bridge Africa’s infrastructure gap.

Almost half of the $19 billion of Chinese outbound loans poured into infrastructure projects in sub-Saharan Africa since 2014 were made in 2017.

The research by Baker McKenzie and IJGlobal, the leading trade publication for infrastructure projects, is drawn exclusively from fully financed projects and excludes recent announcements of government funding commitments.

At a BRICS Energy event which preceded the main summit, Baker McKenzie head of energy, mining and infrastructure Kieran Whyte said President Xi Jinping’s recent tour of African countries ahead of the summit was proof of the increasing interdependence of the maturing but still fast growing Chinese economy and developing economies in Africa.

This week, China pledged to invest $14.7 billion in South Africa and to grant loans to state owned enterprises Eskom and Transnet.

Recent examples of large power deals in Africa where at least half of the finance was provided by Chinese lenders include the $5.8 billion Mambila Hydropower Plant in Nigeria, Kenya’s Lamu coal-fired power plant, the Medupi coal-fired power plant in South Africa and Zambia’s $1.5 billion Kafue Gorge Lower Hydro Power Plant. (ANA)

Source: Weekly Xpose

West Wants Only Quick Bucks From Africa, While China Invests for Win-Win Cooperation

re posted from                                         Africa and the World

West Wants Only Quick Bucks From Africa, While China Invests for Win-Win Cooperation

West Wants Only Quick Bucks From Africa, While China Invests for Win-Win Cooperation

July 24, 2018

‘West wants only quick buck from Africa, while China invests for win-win cooperation’

Below are excerpts from an interview that I did with RT on the significance of the trip by China President, Xi Jinping to Africa this week. I also commented on the dramatically different policy approach that China has towards Africa, than that of the United States. The past several US administrations have failed to construct a strategic policy to assist African nations in developing their economies.

'West wants only quick buck from Africa, while China invests for win-win cooperation'

Chinese President Xi Jinping is on a trip to Africa in a bid to establish deeper trade ties. On Monday, he arrived in South Africa for a state visit, which will be followed later this week by his participation in the 10th BRICS summit in Johannesburg. Earlier, the Chinese leader visited Rwanda and Senegal, which is the first West-African country to be involved in China’s “Belt and Road” infrastructure project.

Beijing has been expanding its presence in Africa in recent years, investing $39 billion in the continent in 2017.

Political analysts told RT that countries in Africa are turning to China because of US government policies.

RT: What do you think Xi Jinping will be hoping to get from his tour of Africa?

City view of Bahrain's capital Manama © Hamad I Mohammed

Lawrence Freeman: I think this is an indication by President Xi of how important they view their collaboration with Africa. He is going to be visiting four countries and they are going to end up at the BRICS Summit in South Africa. This is a continuation for the last several years of the ‘Belt and Road’ policy in Africa. And it has been a real boost for African development policies, especially in the areas of infrastructure, energy, roads and rail. And this indicates that they are going to continue along that policy for sure.

RT: Do you think China’s interests in Africa are purely economic or are they also about greater geopolitical influence?

LF: China, especially under this president, has a view of a win-win cooperation, that countries can work together for the common benefit of a mankind, that they will benefit from economic cooperation. The African countries certainly will. There has been no infrastructure built in Africa since the colonial period. The West refused, the US state has refused, Europe has refused. So, China building its infrastructure which you see in Kenya, in Nigeria, Ethiopia and other places, this is a real positive step for the development of Africa. And I think the Chinese want to help Africa. They will make money, of course. The Africans will improve their economies. And the people’s standard of living will improve and hopefully we’ll eliminate the poverty in Africa.

RT: Many Western countries are wary of investing in Africa due to instability and security problems. But China doesn’t seem to have been put off by these concerns. Why is that the case?

LF: China under this president has a vision for the future. They develop themselves and they develop their neighbors and they develop other countries around the world. So, the whole concept of the ‘Belt and Road’ is counter to geopolitical thinking, it is countries working together, they call it win-win. And the problem is that the West has no vision for development of Africa, has refused to develop Africa, so therefore they attack Africa, they complain about Africa’s loan, they complain about the debt. The debt under Western countries, the IMF and the World Bank far exceeds anything that the Chinese have in terms of debt with African countries. So, the West has to get over their problems, get over the geopolitical thinking, stop demonizing China and actually if the president was intelligent in this question, he would join the ‘Belt and Road’ because if China and the US joined together, we could transform the continent and eliminate the poverty and hunger. And that is what I am trying to do.

The US influence on Africa was already dwindling well before Trump came into the play. And it will continue to dwindle because of some of his comments, his attitude towards Africans, and his position on Africa in general. He is only interested in military bases. And Africans, I am afraid, are very much interested in partnership and those who take them seriously. And like a liberalized continent, it is voting with its feet and it is changing the US in every sector, that I know of, in favor of the Chinese. And China already had a huge presence and influence and that influence has just grown to levels for which even if the Americans were to try now unlikely to ever catch the Chinese in my lifetime. – Ayo Johnson, journalist & founder of Viewpoint Africa

The US has a very small outlook towards Africa and the rest of the world. They do not want to invest in the infrastructure, which is a long-term investment but it improves the entire economy. And they haven’t. The basic attitude of the US… is to make money, to make double-digit profits overnight. They are not interested in the long-term development of a country. That is why the US and the West built no railroads, they were built with China’s help, China has built the new hydro-energy plants, China has built new ports. And there are many more things that they are working on across Africa. So, the problem is that the West is not really thinking how to develop this continent, they are thinking in terms of how to make some fast bucks…

Source: lawrencefreemanafricaandtheworld

Leading the Lambs to Slaughter,British Lawn Jockey Obama Seeks a White Horse

LAROUCHE SOUTH AFRICA

www.larouchesouthafrica.com

 

Leading the Lambs to Slaughter,British Lawn Jockey Obama Seeks a White Horse

by Ramasimong Phillip Tsokolibane
21 July 2018

On July 17, that loyal servant of the British Empire and its liberal monetarist system, Barack Obama, used the podium of the annual Nelson Mandela Lecture, on the centenary of tata’s birth, to arrogantly claim the mantle of Madiba, loudly proclaiming his willingness to fight for justice, ‘democratic values’, ‘human rights’, and a more equal distribution of wealth, and in effect offering to lead a global movement to fight for these values. The former U.S. President and full-time British black lawn jockey now seeks his ‘white horse’ to ride—that is, a movement of fools and dupes, whom he will lead to their own slaughter, in an effort to ‘reform’ the liberal monetarist world order. That order cannot be reformed. It must be totally discarded, if mankind is to survive much further into this new millennium.

Judging by the response of the large and cheering crowd that packed Johannesburg’s Wanderers sports stadium, his offer and message were well received. His message was not only addressed to South Africans, but, via the mass media, to a global audience.

Perhaps when the air clears a bit, some people may reflect on what he said, and will find it to be so much sophist bullshit, in classy packaging, presented by one of the foremost sophists of our day. Thinking a bit harder, they might see, all over this speech, not an echo of our great leader, but a great hollowness played by a dying British Empire and its bitch Queen—they who would use Obama to put his finger in an already failing dyke, to hold back a truly global revolution that is welling up to wipe away the old failing monetarist order, along with its British Royal masters and such loyal servants as Obama.

Obama tried to put a label on our revolution, calling it reactionary, and saying that this is what we must fear. No Mr O, it is precisely those like you who claim that the system can be saved and reformed that we must fear. Reactionaries are present in every revolutionary period. In the end, because they have nothing positive to say about the future, they are swept aside by the revolutionary process itself.

No, it is Obama and his ilk we must fear, because they seek to deceive people into believing that there just might yet be a way to save their sinking selves within the existing paradigm, when this is impossible. They divert people from the true tasks at hand, as they vainly attempt to disrupt and delay the process of revolutionary change, so that their masters might have a chance (as they imagine) to put in place what is needed to slaughter their potential opponents.

Obama is a liar, a fact known to many Americans, who heard for eight years his lies about wanting to fight the ‘powers of greed and money’, when all he did as President was bail out the big banks and keep the big-time crooks and speculators—who run the banks and other corrupted financial institutions—from being prosecuted. It’s no surprise that the Obama Foundation is funded with millions upon millions of dollars from Wall Street and the institutions that protect Wall Street. It is funded not only by Goldman Sachs, but by the Ford Foundation and other foundations that front for Wall Street.

Nobel Peace Prize laureate Barack Obama claims to seek ‘peace’, proclaiming he wants to end the bloodshed in the Middle East and elsewhere. Yet, as President, Obama was the most savage and brutal of leaders, who organised the destruction of nations, such Syria and Libya, murdered and assassinated leaders, and ordered the deaths of those he claimed were terrorists–without trial, and often without any proof at all. Obama was in reality ‘the black Bush’, whose policies and directions, like the white Bush, left a trail of dead bodies strewn across the planet.

What Obama didn’t say, what he deliberately ignored, speaks volumes as to his agentry for, and loyalty to his British masters. There was not one word about the BRICS alliance, which represents the seed crystal of a new global order based on peace through economic development, and whose July 25-27 Summit our nation will host. This is where the true challenge to the existing system lies. In the policies of the One Belt One Road initiative of China there are no losers, only winners; there are no adversaries, only collaborators. No mention of any of this by our self-proclaimed visionary, who did find time, however, to attack China and by implication Russia, our nation’s most powerful allies, for their allegedly ‘authoritarian’ forms of economics and mercantilist trade policies which, he said, African nations and others are supposed to reject:

Many developing countries now are looking at China’s model of authoritarian control combined with mercantilist capitalism as preferable to the messiness of democracy. Who needs free speech as long as the economy is going good? The free press is under attack. Censorship and state control of media is on the rise. Social media—once seen as a mechanism to promote knowledge and understanding and solidarity—has proved to be just as effective promoting hatred and paranoia and propaganda and conspiracy theories’. (Applause)

Africa should reject what? Are you crazy—you stupid, arrogant British tool? While you lie about the true content of China and Russia’s policy towards the world, you want to drive all of us back into the hands of the masters of the dying monetarist system, which even you admitted is not working so well.

For reasons I have discussed before, there is no possibility of reforming the monetarist system, whose death occurred, in reality, more than 50 years ago, which system has been sustained only at great and unacceptable suffering and death, and by the ability of its British masters and their American allies to extract their ‘pound of flesh’ to support mountains of worthless speculative and other paper ‘assets’. Nevertheless, the British wish to use their black lawn jockey Obama as a sort of Pied Piper who, through clever sophistry, will end up leading those who follow him to their own slaughter when the moment of revolutionary change is at hand. For him to do so by invoking the name of a true revolutionary, Madiba—as I warned he would—is disgusting and a desecration of Mandela’s memory and life’s work. It was equally disgusting to see our President and other leaders fawning over Obama, as if he were some deity.

I urge my fellow Patriots not to be diverted by this sophist, but to ‘keep your eyes on the prize’. As I said, the BRICS Summit is now only days away. That is where real history must and will be made, where the pathway to a new global order must be laid out.

Barack Obama and his masters would prefer to make no mention of the BRICS, while they seek to target and destabilise its members—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and our own country, South Africa. They know, even if they don’t say it, that the present form of the monetarist order may not survive beyond this year, but they do not want a BRICS challenge to that order.

We should be happy to be alive in a truly revolutionary moment, in which great change is possible—if we ignore false leaders and their sophistry. Change must occur. Change will occur.

Do you have the courage to determine what it will be, and not leave your children’s future to livery like Obama, or worse?

Ramasimong Phillip Tsokolibane
21 July 2018

Forum on China-Africa Cooperation: Win for Africa’s Development

re posted from                                   Africa and the World

Forum on China-Africa Cooperation: Win for Africa’s Development

Forum on China-Africa Cooperation: Win for Africa’s Development

Who Owns Africa’s Debt: China or Western Nations & Institutions?

re posted from                              Africa and the World

Who Owns Africa’s Debt: China or Western Nations & Institutions?

Who Owns Africa’s Debt: China or Western Nations & Institutions?

July 18,  2018

It is more than  ironic that the West is complaining about Africa’s debt to China. Since the 1960s, Western nations, the IMF, World Bank, Paris Club, etc. have “looted” Africa of 100 of billions of dollars in bloated debt payments and through the manipulation of currencies, and terms of trade. Of course, the West has participated for over a century in massive stealing of Africa’s resources, and before that, the forced exportation of millions of slaves. Let the truth be heard.

Some Western media and politicians have recently created the phrase “debtbook diplomacy” to accuse China of “miring nations in debt” and “undercutting their sovereignty.”

According to CNN, a new report presented to the US State Department claims the “Chinese government is leveraging billions of dollars in debt to gain political leverage with developing countries.”

“This phrase ‘debtbook diplomacy’ shows the West is nervous of China-Africa cooperation. ‘Debtbook diplomacy’ is what they did to Africa for decades, but now China is actually helping African nations rid themselves of ‘the debt trap’ set by the West,” said Wang Yiwei, director of the Institute of International Affairs at Renmin University of China in Beijing.

The West left African countries with a heavy debt on projects and failed to support their sustainable development, or to increase productivity and help them realize self-reliance, Wang noted. “Western countries wanted Africa to become their raw materials supplier while maintaining their post-colonial influence over the continent. This prevented African countries from realizing their own industrialization, Wang said.

China, on the other hand, is helping the nations move toward self-reliance and industrialization. The West doesn’t like that and this is why it is attempting to slander China, Wang added.

Xu Weizhong, deputy director of the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations’ Institute of West Asian and African Studies, said that “Africa needs a lot of investment to build infrastructure, and China’s loans, which have increased African countries’ debt, are necessary for their development.”

China’s assistance to Africa differs from what the West offers. China has a “crucial principle,” which is to respect African countries’ will and conditions. China has never forced African countries to accept loans on large infrastructure projects beyond their ability to pay, Wang said.

“China and Africa have walked an extraordinary path in developing relations and cooperation, and our peoples have benefited greatly from it,” Assistant Foreign Minister Chen Xiaodong said at the opening ceremony of the Seventh China-Africa Think Tank Forum in Beijing on July 4.

“A minority of Westerners are blinded by their ‘pride and prejudice’ and choose not to see this… maybe that is what they call ‘sour grapes’?” Chen said.

West is largest debt holder

Data shows that Western countries and West-led organizations are the largest owners of African debt, not China, Shen Shiwei, a research fellow at the Charhar Institute and former government relations and business consultant for Chinese enterprises in Africa, said in an article published on CGTN’s website.

Research from SAIS and the China Africa Research Initiative at Johns Hopkins University shows that China has provided loans worth $114.4 billion to Africa from 2000-2016, which accounts for 1.8 percent of Africa’s total external debt. 

“The IMF and World Bank own 36 percent of African debt. These multilateral financial institutions and other giant investors in Europe and the US have far stronger leverage [than China],” Shen noted in his article.

“For historical reasons, the West has many interests in Africa. Those that are reasonable should be respected when we cooperate with Africa. But for those that are unreasonable, should China and African countries continue to respect them? Before accusing China, the West should think about this carefully,” Xu said                   (emphasis added)

Source: lawrencefreemanafricaandtheworld

Obama Stinks of the Dying British Empire

LAROUCHE SOUTH AFRICA

www.larouchesouthafrica.com

Obama Stinks of the Dying British Empire

by Ramasimong Phillip Tsokolibane,  17 July 2018

There is a real stench rising from the offices of the Nelson Mandela Foundation in Houghton, as we celebrate the centenary of our father.

No doubt the stink will increase in pungency now that its carrier has arrived, the fake African, loyal British agent, and former American President, Barack Obama. He is the ‘celebrity speaker’, invited by the Foundation, to deliver the Nelson Mandela Annual Lecture today in Johannesburg, disgracing the memory of Madiba. Obama, as a representative of the dying Empire of the bitch Queen of England, stands for the evil of that Empire whose racism, wars, and enforced underdevelopment continue to murder Africans and others around the world.

In a statement I issued on June 16, I called for British lawn jockey Obama to be disinvited, and that he not be allowed to dishonour the memory of Mandela. In this effort, I have been joined by many individuals and organisations, including CAGE Africa, the Palestine Solidarity Alliance, and the Media Review Network.

But the corrupt Nelson Mandela Foundation, whose board of directors is British saturated, replied that it stood by Obama’s ‘values’. They have been given their orders from London, and these fools and worse will not go against their masters.

The chairman of the Foundation’s board is Njabulo Ndebele, who is also chairman of the Mandela Rhodes Foundation that is interlocked with the Rhodes Trust, which recruits loyalists for the British Empire using scholarships and ‘leadership training’, paid for with Cecil Rhodes’ money. Rhodes has not fallen. The board also includes members such as these:

Mamphela Ramphele, founder of George Soros’ Open Society Foundation for South Africa. She is also a member of the genocidal Club of Rome.

Maya Makanjee, board member of Prince Philip’s Worldwide Fund for Nature.

Tokyo Sexwale, the billionaire who coached Julius Malema for Lord Robin Renwick.

Futhi Mtoba, chairperson of Deloitte Southern Africa. Deloitte, a British multinational, is the largest accounting firm in the world.

Obama, with the cooperation of agents in this country, is on a recruitment drive for traitors, and his George Soros-backed Obama Foundation is now holding a week-long course of training and brainwashing in our country, specifically for that purpose, in the name of his Young African Leaders Initiative (YALI).

As President of the United States, Obama traveled to our country in 2013. In remarks to a YALI Town Hall at the Soweto campus of the University of Johannesburg on June 29, as Madiba lay dying in hospital, Obama told us and all of Africa that we must learn to live with, and love the misery of our underdevelopment; and that we must not make demands for a higher standard of living or for industrial growth, lest we use up ‘scarce resources’ that must be allocated to the richer nations. His actual words were these: ‘Ultimately, if you think about all the youth that everybody has mentioned here in Africa, if everybody is raising living standards to the point where everybody has got a car and everybody has got air conditioning, and everybody has got a big house, well, the planet will boil over …’

As the leader of the LaRouche movement in South Africa, I demonstrated against Obama and his evil message. We were responsible for giving the large demonstration its theme, by providing the worldwide media audience an appropriate image of Obama—the famous LaRouche poster depicting him as Hitler.

 

Now with his return, I again call on South Africans to protest Obama’s visit and his desecration of Mandela’s memory, in this centenary of Madiba’s birth. I also demand that the Nelson Mandela Foundation and its sponsors and partners make public how much they have paid Obama, a mercenary who seldom does anything from the goodness of his heart.

I laugh at the freakout in the world press criticising President Donald Trump for refusing to bow to the bitch Queen, for daring to walk in front of her. I remember Obama’s bowed head in a similar meeting, while he was President, a couple of years ago. The British tabloids stupidly called President Trump’s action an affront to the British people, whose symbol, they claimed, is the Queen.

But the old bitch is powerless to stop the long wave of history that is about to relegate her and her oligarchic ilk to the dustbin of history. She has been allowed to do far too much evil for far too long. She and her loyal servants, such as Obama, are trying to halt the now steady march of peoples here in Africa and elsewhere into a better future—a future where what the BRICS alliance represents becomes the seed crystal for a new economic order, organised on the premise that real value is the product of creative human labour, which only our species has the ability to accomplish.

Our nation will host the BRICS summit at the end of this month, and it would be proper to view the Obama visit as part of the drive by the monarchy and its financial empire, ruled over by the City of London and its Wall Street satrapy, to ‘screw things up’.

They will succeed, however, only if we let them, by failing to do what is necessary. We must make sure that our citizens know that what is at stake is the future of all of mankind. Obama stands on the wrong side of history, between those who will fight to bring a new just world economic order into being, and those who will fight to your death to sustain the old, failing monetarist paradigm.

Those marvelous scientists who run the South African MeerKAT radio telescope are able to look into the center of our beautiful galaxy, looking into our past, so that we also better understand the possibilities of the future. In like manner—if we truly understand that the past does not itself determine the present or the future, but that we have it in our power to make the future for mankind—then we can see that Obama, and even his mistress the Bitch Queen, are already becoming the past.

And we who have imagination, we who study what the BRICS are doing, can see the future that must come into being, a future that eliminates the power of oligarchies like the Brutish Queen and all the Royals, who impede human progress. To say ‘Yes’ to this future, we must say ‘No’ to Obama. Join with me in saying ‘No!’ to Obama.

 

Ramasimong Phillip Tsokolibane 17 July 2018

ramasimongt@hotmail.com

Source: LaRouche South Africa