re posted from LAROUCHEPAC
War Hawks Go For The Kill
Just over a year ago (June 28, 2019), Russian President Putin and President Trump met face to face on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Osaka, Japan. This dialog and negotiation is exactly what the War Hawks seek to prevent and destroy. Photo: en.kremlin.ru
In a desperate effort to break Republican support for President Trump, and to blunt the efforts of Russian President Putin to organize a summit of leading nations to address the global coronavirus pandemic and the worldwide economic collapse underway, forces committed to maintaining the present dangerously dysfunctional world order have launched their most unhinged attack yet. Using the New York Times (NYT) and the Guardian to lead the assault, anonymous “intelligence sources” claim that the Russians are paying a bounty to Taliban militants to kill American and allied soldiers in Afghanistan. They further claim that Trump has done nothing about this, either because he had not been briefed, or worse, out of “deference” to Putin, thus bringing the matter back to the original theme of Russiagate, that Putin “has something” on President Trump which he is using to control him!
As with the lies fabricated in the Russiagate story, the NYT and other media treat the allegations coming from the intelligence community as if they are proven facts. In their July 1 follow-up to the original story, the authors begin, “Russia’s complicity in the bounty plot came into sharper focus Tuesday”, which is an assertion that the wild claims made in their first articles are now accepted as true. The same approach has been taken by Democrats, such as House Speaker Pelosi who, after admitting she had not yet been briefed, nevertheless declared Trump’s failure to condemn Russia as “outrageous”, accusing him of wanting “to ignore” any charges against Russia. She then repeated her line from Russiagate, “With Trump, all roads lead to Putin.”
Not to be outdone, likely Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden declared of Trump, “His entire presidency has been a gift to Putin.” Biden charged Trump with engaging in “a betrayal of the most sacred duty we bear as a nation, to protect…our troops when we send them into harm’s way.” Perhaps Biden does not remember that the reason there are still U.S. troops in Afghanistan, in “harm’s way”, is because he and Obama kept them there, with neither a strategy for victory nor withdrawal, and with no compelling national security interest at stake!
Backing up Biden was Representative Seth Moulton, who accused Trump of “treason”, adding that he is responsible for the deaths of any service members in Afghanistan. None of his Democratic attackers acknowledged that Trump has been winding down the failed Afghan war, a policy which most of them oppose. Neither do they mention that the conduct of the war has been exposed by internal Defense Department documents as a failure due to fraudulent assessments and incompetent strategy, while being supported by lies about the “success” of the mission.
While the Democratic response is predictable, what is different in this latest effort to smear Trump and Putin is that the allegations are designed to provoke Republicans to distance themselves from Trump. Senator Sasse of Nebraska, who has never been a strong supporter of Trump, blasted Trump for inaction, saying that what he wants to hear from the administration is “their plan for Taliban and GRU agents in body bags,” an open call for the murder of Russians, which would be an act of war. Rep. Liz Cheney, the daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney and a hardcore neocon war hawk herself, demanded to know what has been done “to protect our forces and hold Putin accountable.”
Equally provocative was an ad produced by anti-Trump Republicans, the “Lincoln Project”, run by former aides and allies of war hawk Senator John McCain and the Bush machine, which was aired in “battleground” states within hours after the story broke in the Times. “Now we know Vladimir Putin pays a bounty for the murder of American soldiers,” the ad’s narrator solemnly intones. “Donald Trump knows too, and does nothing.” At the same time, another anti-Trump PAC has emerged, “43 Alumni for Biden”, referring to officials who had served in the George W. Bush White House and in his campaign (Bush was the 43rd president). They claim to have recruited 200 Republicans to join their PAC to defeat Trump.
And as the NYT story was breaking, several polls were released which show a widening lead for Biden over Trump, with some giving Biden a lead of more than ten points. In response, Fox News reporter Trace Gallagher suggested that Trump “might drop out…if his poll numbers don’t improve.”
White House officials were quick to point out that the allegations in the NYT articles are “unverified”, which explains why the President was not briefed on them. Defense Department officials and military leaders from the Pentagon confirmed this assessment, and the National Security Agency disavowed the story of the Russian bounties. As for Trump, he tweeted out a response, describing it as “made up by Fake News….The secret source probably does not even exist….Just another hoax.”
COUP PLOT THICKENS
A crucial element in the story is the role of British intelligence, which is not surprising, as much of the narrative of the original Russiagate fabrication originated in Her Majesty’s intelligence networks. The story in the Guardian even reported that British intelligence officials were briefed on the story before the Americans were! The story in the Guardian claims that unit 29155 of the intelligence branch of the Russian military, the GRU, is responsible for the payment plan. This is the same unit allegedly involved in the poisoning of Russian defector Sergei Skripal and his daughter, a highly dubious accusation in March 2018 used to justify new, punitive sanctions against Russia. Among those cited confirming the bounty plot in the Guardian are a Russian MI6 asset, and Sir Andrew Wood, former British ambassador to Russia, who delivered the Christopher Steele dossier against Trump to anti-Trump Senator John McCain in December 2016. Steele, an “ex”-MI6 operative whose dossier was paid for by the Clinton campaign and included salacious, slanderous attacks on Trump which were used by the FBI to obtain warrants from the secret FISA Court to spy on the Trump campaign, continues to be active, despite the near-universal recognition that his charges were not only unverifiable, but part of an elaborate disinformation campaign designed to defeat Trump’s candidacy, or provide the grounds for his removal after his election. Steele recently spoke before the British parliament, and still maintains that “Putin owns Trump.” It is noteworthy that Skripal’s defection had been run by Steele’s Russian division of MI6, and there are reports that he may have been a source of some of the lies in Steele’s dossier.
The release of the bounty plot story coincides with a broader attack on Trump, coming from military and intelligence circles, including many who served under Trump. It is this coordinated effort which is aimed at breaking Republican supporters away from Trump, in a way which was not possible previously, by claiming his opposition to the “endless wars” launched by his predecessors, Bush and Obama, is a sign of weakness in the face of an aggressive assertion of Russian imperial interests. As Trump’s repeated denunciation of these wars has been central to his popular support, these networks had remained mostly silent, except when Republicans in the Congress joined with Democrats to denounce his withdrawal of troops from Syria, and his outreach to the Taliban, to end the war in Afghanistan.
This line of attack was initiated with the release of John Bolton’s book, a blast against Trump from a war hawk who openly derides Trump for his unwillingness to launch physical strikes against Iran, and for negotiating with North Korea’s Kim Jong-un. It escalated when former Defense Secretary, retired General Mattis, joined in denouncing Trump’s threat to invoke the Insurrection Act, to bring in troops to quell the rioting following the murder of George Floyd. While past presidents have invoked this act, when public safety was threatened by violence, Trump ultimately did not invoke it, yet was denounced as an “authoritarian” for even raising it as an option, when provocateurs from Antifa and other violent countergangs were turning some American cities into war zones. Antifa is funded by George Soros, who played a leading role in financing the anti-Russian Maidan coup in Ukraine in 2014, and has been an outspoken supporter of the regime change coup being run against Trump.
The public emergence of Mattis opened the door for yet a further escalation, with the publication by anti-Trump CNN of an article by Carl Bernstein, a former Washington Post reporter who was chosen as a recipient of leaks from FBI and other Justice Department officials in the successful Watergate plot to bring down President Richard Nixon in the early 1970s. Bernstein’s June 30 article cites numerous former Trump administration officials, including Mattis and former Secretary of State Tillerson, two former National Security advisers, and a former chief of staff, Gen. John Kelly, who claim that Trump “pandered Putin” and “abused allies”, and that he was “unprepared for discussions” with foreign leaders. According to Bernstein, Trump is described as “delusional”, and his calls to foreign leaders are referred to as “abominations.” According to one of these officials, Trump “himself posed a danger to the national security of the United States.” Bernstein concludes by contrasting Trump’s “deference” to Putin with the “tougher, more realistic view of Russia expressed by the U.S. Congress, American intelligence agencies and the long-standing post-war policy consensus of the U.S. and its European allies,” citing opposition by these networks to his withdrawal of troops from Syria as an example.
One commentator, journalist Max Blumenthal, described this, combined with the attacks from Republican members of Congress on his repeated unwillingness to confront Putin, as an all-out, open declaration of war from the “national security state”, using the media, and particularly the New York Times for the escalation. He referred to the Times as “the media wing of the CIA.”
A legitimate question to those behind the attack would be “Why launch this offensive now?” The answer is that the anti-Trump assault never stopped, despite the exposure of the fraud perpetrated in Russiagate, and the failure to remove him following his impeachment in Ukrainegate. The underlying cause of the incessant attacks, which have dominated the three-and-a-half years of his presidency, is the threat he posed to the permanent wars demanded by geopoliticians running U.S. foreign and military policy. This was driven home in Trump’s commencement address at West Point last month, when he asserted that the “era of endless wars” is over, and the U.S. will no longer be the “policeman of the world.” It was reiterated in the statement by his press secretary Kayleigh McEnany, in response to the charge that he was endangering U.S. troops by not confronting Putin. She said, “…the ultimate way to protect American troops, is not to get into needless foreign wars.”
But this is not just an issue of Trump, or American politics, but one of moves to counter the post-war domination of international relations by the imperial forces of the British monarchy and the City of London. The urgency behind the immediate goal of the removal of Trump now, or at least in the November 2020 presidential election, is to prevent him from ending the wars of the last two decades, including his efforts in Afghanistan and Syria. In both of these British-American disasters, as well as in addressing hot spots such as Libya, Iran, North Korea and Ukraine, there has been cooperation between Trump and Putin, in spite of the slander that Trump’s desire to work with Putin is that he owes his election to him. A major target of the escalation is to prevent a Trump-Putin summit, and to prevent the U.S. from joining the summit of the Permanent-Five United Nation’s Security Council members, for which Putin has been organizing with great determination. The Guardian referred derisively to the increased contact between Trump and Putin, identifying at least six phone calls between the two since March of this year. Trump’s call to include Russia in an expanded G7 has also been identified as a sign of submission. In addition to discussions with Trump, Putin has had “constructive” conversations with French President Macron, and continues to work closely with China’s President Xi Jinping, while Trump, Putin and Erdogan conducted a video summit this week to discuss moving ahead with the Astana process for peace and reconstruction of Syria.
Thus, the “Russia, Russia, Russia” mantra cannot be dropped by the war hawks and geopoliticians, which dominate both parties, for their system is collapsing, and the world is ripe to move to a new, post-geopolitical paradigm, which they are desperately trying to prevent. This is seen in statements such as that of Richard Haas, director of the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR), who lied in a Twitter post that “Russia is carrying out covert wars against U.S. troops in Afghanistan and our democracy here at home.” The CFR was established in 1921 as a post-World War I American partner of the British Royal Institute of International Affairs. It is also manifested in a deranged statement from Obama’s National Security adviser Susan Rice, who accused Russia in a June 13 interview of being behind “decisive painful issues…to divide us,” insisting that in the riots in American cities which followed the killing of George Floyd, Russia is “fomenting extremists on both sides.” Rice is considered to be among the front-runners to be selected as a Vice-President with Biden on the Democratic Party ticket for the fall election. That Rice could cite no evidence to back this claim was not addressed by the interviewer, just as the anti-Trump mainstream media has accepted the evidence-free charges of Russia paying bounties to kill Americans in Afghanistan.
The Schiller Institute’s Helga Zepp LaRouche said that the best response to this latest coup plot would be for Trump to announce he will meet with Putin as soon as possible, and supports his effort to pull together a P-5 summit. Such a response does not only defeat the plans of the coup plotters to prevent Trump-Putin cooperation, but would begin a diplomatic course which would overturn the collapsing world order of the geopoliticians, while putting leading nations on the road to jointly addressing the “common aims of mankind.”